openyoureyespeople! asked:


Summary: Since September 11, 2051, with the passing of the 50th anniversary of the 911 destruction, which resulted in the gradual destruction of the USA as both a republic and a democracy, this comprehensive history sought to understand, Just what happened and why.

To summarize: The 911 destruction, portrayed persistently in the immediate aftermath, as a terrorist attack fifty years ago, proved in time to have been a combined black operation by the New Triple Alliance (NTA). The alliance of Israel, Britain and the USA sought to engineer popular antipathy towards weaker oil-bearing, Islamic countries for a multitude of reasons.

Chiefly because the three NTA countries possessed few or fast depleting oil resources by the end of the 20th century, powerbrokers within the CFR and the NTA decided to stage a highly sensational “attack.” The planning for this attack required years of careful yet secretive planning in advance and the cooperation of highly placed criminal elements within each of the three governments.

Initially, the attack seemed to be a success. But by 2008 polls indicated many US citizens, disgruntled by endless wars, endless security measures, endless administration deception and, especially, the disaster of the US dollar, began to press for a fuller investigation. Also the widespread use of 911 “truth” (videos, lectures, websites, public speeches, etc) forced an uncomfortable awareness on Americans, followed by predictable anger and rage.

In the election year of 2008, during a period of intensely low ratings for the outgoing president GW Bush, another highly suspicious false flag “attack” nearly occurred. Fortunately the bomb planters were caught, not only on CCTV cameras but on dozens of cell phone cams too. (At the time, widespread Internet use of “You Tube” allowed immediate coverage of an event often censored by the then US media). Critics noted that several federal agencies intended to declare martial law and possibly cancel the national elections. These accusations were never fully investigated.

Soon after the startling arrest of the group of swarthy men, apprehended in a pair of white vans, confessions by the would-be-bombers followed. The motley group of CIA, MI-5 and Mossad agents admitted, under torture by local Texas police officers, that they worked under the covert direction of the three NTA governments. Public denial, shock and heavy media suppression of the story, predictably followed.

The detainees were questioned in secret by the FBI and most of them deported several months later.

Following a number of suicides among retired US officers, many of them formerly with the Pentagon, key generals stepped forward in 2012 and publicly confessed to their involvement in the initial 911 attack. Claiming misguided patriotism (resulting in mass murder), the former high-ranking officers, many connected to Able Danger, testified in great detail to their limited, albeit crucial, involvement. The house of cards, long known simply as 911, collapsed nearly as quickly as the dollar.

Widespread acts of civil disobedience, coupled with intense demands for an unbiased investigation, followed by the flight of several key suspects, among them Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Marvin Bush, Phillip Zelikow, et al and the untimely deaths of others, among them Larry Silverstein, Rudi Giuliani, Dick Cheney, et al, lent weight to those demanding a true investigation.

After long ignoring growing public demand, Congress finally authorized a committee with full subpoena powers. Several citizen watchdog groups volunteered to oversee the entire process. Demanding full disclosure, the watchdog groups pointed to the much-discredited, Kean-Hamiliton 911 Commission Report as an example of the sort of brazen government cover up to be avoided.

By 2020, with the US in the tenth year of a lengthy austerity program, precipitated by the sudden crash of the US dollar, a predictable crash and painful depression due to several wasteful foreign wars, and the resultant massive corruption/ inflation they entailed, Congress finally authorized the new 911 Report. After 24 months and thousands of witnesses, all of the testimony open to the public, the investigation concluded.

Called simply the 911 Report, the 911-page document detailed massive criminal intent, perjury, premeditated murder, treason, arson, skyjacking, embezzlement, crimes against humanity and widespread government complicity within the top echelons of the FBI, NORAD, NIST and the NSA.

Under pressure, the US Supreme Court issued indictments toward the end of 2022. Arrests followed, suicides occurred, arraignment and convictions resulted, lengthy prison sentences, lethal injections (for treason & mass murder) and disgrace for hundreds of those involved was the inevitable result. Both the House of Bush and The House of Clinton, twin dynasties linked together in decades-long criminal activities, had now fallen into deserved disrepute, akin to modern-day Medicis or Corleones, but with far fewer scruples.

Conclusion:

Because 911 was never fully investigated immediately after September 11, 2001, the massive crimes committed were allowed to go unpunished. Thus the perpetrators were free to commit far greater crimes and reap huge monetary rewards for themselves and their cronies. The resultant wars with Afghanistan and Iraq, the widespread corruption and waste, the toxic spread of DU, the deaths of thousand of US troops and permanent injury to tens of thousands of others, the consensual murder of more than one million Iraqis and the theft of Iraqi oil for NTA members, followed finally by the ill-chosen attempt to strike Iran by the combined military forces of the NTA, and the collapse of the inflated US dollar, at last awakened the world to the full criminal intents of the globalists behind the scenes. Fully half those subpoenaed and a third of those indicted, under the new 911 investigations, held membership in the CFR.

Still, the fallout from 911 continues to resonant today. The nearly 3,000 murdered on September 11, 2001 led to a further 30,000 early deaths of heroic first responders due to carcinogens in the air of lower Manhattan. The premeditated poisoning of New York, through the pre-planned yet highly profitable destruction of the World Trade Center, then led to wholesale poisoning, plundering and persecution of the Persian Gulf. Nearly three million (and counting) were killed in the NTA wars against oil-rich Islamic nations between the years 2002–2012.

Fifty years later, with the benefit of access to historical documents, the worldview of the master planners of 911 can be clearly seen, recognized and condemned, for what it evidently was: An inside job, perpetrated by a few immoral men, not that far removed from Hitler, bent on worldwide domination and the control and manipulation of world markets.
Yes its long, but do read it!
enjoy, thanx for your +ve answers, remember where you read it first ! ;o)

open your eyes….

The Star asked:


NEARLY SEVENTY YEARS ago, in the course of World War II, a heinous crime was committed in the city of Leningrad. For more than a thousand days, a gang of extremists called “the Red Army” held the millions of the town’s inhabitants hostage and provoked retaliation from the German Wehrmacht from inside the population centers. The Germans had no alternative but to bomb and shell the population and to impose a total blockade, which caused the death of hundreds of thousands.

Some time before that, a similar crime was committed in England. The Churchill gang hid among the population of London, misusing the millions of citizens as a human shield. The Germans were compelled to send their Luftwaffe and reluctantly reduce the city to ruins.

They called it the Blitz. This is the description that would now appear in the history books – if the Germans had won the war. Absurd? No more than the daily descriptions in our media, which are being repeated ad nauseam: the Hamas terrorists use the inhabitants of Gaza as “hostages” and exploit the women and children as “human shields”, they leave us no alternative but to carry out massive bombardments, in which, to our deep sorrow, thousands of women, children and unarmed men are killed and injured.

IN THIS WAR, as in any modern war, propaganda plays a major role. The disparity between the forces, between the Israeli army – with its airplanes, gunships, drones, warships, artillery and tanks – and the few thousand lightly armed Hamas fighters, is one to a thousand, perhaps one to a million. In the political arena the gap between them is even wider. But in the propaganda war, the gap is almost infinite.

Almost all the Western media initially repeated the official Israeli propaganda line. They almost entirely ignored the Palestinian side of the story, not to mention the daily demonstrations of the Israeli peace camp. The rationale of the Israeli government (“The state must defend its citizens against the Qassam rockets”) has been accepted as the whole truth. The view from the other side, that the Qassams are a retaliation for the siege that starves the one and a half million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip, was not mentioned at all. Only when the horrible scenes from Gaza started to appear on Western TV screens, did world public opinion gradually begin to change.

True, Western and Israeli TV channels showed only a tiny fraction of the dreadful events that appear 24 hours every day on Aljazeera’s Arabic channel, but one picture of a dead baby in the arms of its terrified father is more powerful than a thousand elegantly constructed sentences from the Israeli army spokesman. And that is what is decisive, in the end.

War – every war – is the realm of lies. Whether called propaganda or psychological warfare, everybody accepts that it is right to lie for one’s country. Anyone who speaks the truth runs the risk of being branded a traitor.

The trouble is that propaganda is most convincing for the propagandist himself. And after you convince yourself that a lie is the truth and falsification reality, you can no longer make rational decisions. An example of this process surrounds the most shocking atrocity of this war so far: the shelling of the UN Fakhura school in Jabaliya refugee camp.

Immediately after the incident became known throughout the world, the army “revealed” that Hamas fighters had been firing mortars from near the school entrance. As proof they released an aerial photo which indeed showed the school and the mortar. But within a short time the official army liar had to admit that the photo was more than a year old. In brief: a falsification.

Later the official liar claimed that “our soldiers were shot at from inside the school”. Barely a day passed before the army had to admit to UN personnel that that was a lie, too. Nobody had shot from inside the school, no Hamas fighters were inside the school, which was full of terrified refugees. But the admission made hardly any difference anymore. By that time, the Israeli public was completely convinced that “they shot from inside the school”, and TV announcers stated this as a simple fact.

So it went with the other atrocities. Every baby metamorphosed, in the act of dying, into a Hamas terrorist. Every bombed mosque instantly became a Hamas base, every apartment building an arms cache, every school a terror command post, every civilian government building a “symbol of Hamas rule”. Thus the Israeli army retained its purity as the “most moral army in the world”.

THE TRUTH is that the atrocities are a direct result of the war plan. This reflects the personality of Ehud Barak – a man whose way of thinking and actions are clear evidence of what is called “moral insanity”, a sociopathic disorder.

The real aim (apart from gaining seats in the coming elections) is to terminate the rule of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. In the imagination of the planners, Hamas is an
Tuesday January 13, 2009 08:56 by Uri Avnery

Jack T asked:


I’m talking about Britain selling out probably the only real friend it had in the world for the promise of Libyan oil.

Translated really into Blood money for the lives of 270 people blown to smithereens over the cold skies of Scotland during one Decembers day some 20 years ago.

I was a elementary school then but i remember the evil that came that was to precede 9-11.

So how could Britain do that huh? Free this killer Al-Meghari like that. Why didn’t they just let him rot in that so called Hilton of a jail and lets his testicles rot with cancer?

I mean how would they like it if the US sheltered people who hated Britain huh? How would they for instance have liked it if they freed people who were planning or had planned and committed atrocities against Britain?

I mean i was speechless when i heard he was being freed. That weasel, turncoat Blair how could he do that whilst pretending to be our friend when we invaded Iraq?

Also why doesn’t America just invade or threaten Libya and bring this guy El-meghari and Qaddafi into a US prison and court for Lockerbie? and wipe that dirty smug smirk of Qaddafis face for once and for all?

DO what it does best, act unilaterally? Oh btw Britain this guy is faking it, he probably live now with the world best medical treatment paid by Libyan oil money.

And another thing if any Brits are reading this congratualtions into fast turning into the next Islamic state in Europe after Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania lol!! Oh dont come over here to Florida anymore stay in your little drizzly Island now.
1 second ago – 4 days left to answer.

Democestes asked:


On September 11.2001 Comercial Airliners struck the North and South towers of The World Trade Center, and the Pentagon. The Pentagon was restored completely within the follow year. The World Trade Center is still in Limbo. It is interesting to me that it is a reflection of the state of the United States. The Pentagon is a symbol of the Military and quickly resolved its self to resolving the problems. The World Trade Center is a symbol of the commercial might of the US and therefore a Civillian Symbol. Yet today amid this anniversary of the attacks it remains a hole in the civillian psyche.LEST WE FORGET. That was the motto of the day in 2001. Yet now we are as divided, as the architects and planners, and survivors, and the Government of New York as to what to do with this Hole in the Ground. Comments please!
yes I understand that It would be impossible for towers to be totaly rebuilt in 1 or even 5 years after the attack. ( it only took 3 years to build them the first time) But the civillian side of this hasn’t even agreed on how to begin to rebuild.

I also understand that the Pentagon was already undergoing rennovation which made it easier to rebuild. But we are talking about the focus of the parties involved, and the symbolic nature of the amount of work that has gone into the process
The E-ring of the Pentagon was being refurbished at the time, which accounts for the lower amount of casualties at the time. It was not being used for any military actions, it was not coordinating troop movements, we could have easily left it to be dealt with by the investigators, and taken our time to memorialize the area of the pentagon that was struck.

I still hold to the fact that the weakness shown on the civillian side of the equation is helping to fan the flames of terrorism.

We must unite. And stop all of this personal interest crap that is holding up the
work on Ground Zero.

CHEESY ♥ asked:


Tourist told cops of weirdo

From VERONICA LORRAINE
and NEIL SYSON
in Praia da Luz

Published: Today
COPS were told about a prowler seen near the holiday apartment where Madeleine McCann vanished – but did nothing, it emerged last night.

Private detectives hired by her parents Kate and Gerry will now quiz a British tourist about her crucial sighting of a “weird man” tampering with shutters.

Amanda Mills, 34, spotted the skulking figure a WEEK before Maddie, four, disappeared on May 3 in Praia da Luz, Portugal. The swarthy man appeared to be trying to break in through a bedroom window.

He also tried to wheel away a children’s buggy.

Essex mum-of-three Amanda said: “It was late at night. This guy came along, put his hands on a pushchair outside an apartment and tried to walk off with it.

“He ran off when I made a loud noise to let him know he was being watched. He seemed interested in the windows. He was looking at and through them.

“He set warning bells off in my mind. He was very weird, very dodgy.”

Two days after Maddie went missing, wedding planner Amanda told UK police, the British Embassy in Lisbon and hol complex bosses of her sighting. Seven months later she has yet to be interviewed by Portuguese cops.

She said: “I am astonished. I gave a full statement to Essex police. I know what I saw.”

McCann family spokesman Clarence Mitchell said Amanda will be contacted by Spanish detective agency Metodo 3. They were hired by Kate and Gerry, both 39, as they became frustrated with police progress.

He added: “Amanda is at the top of Metodo 3’s list. This could be crucial.”

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/maddie/article527415.ece

MISES.ORG asked:


Are Consumers Driving Us into Recession?
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

DIGG THIS

With recession looming or already here, the time has arrived for finding scapegoats. Expect a long list of these. Here is the target of the day: tightfisted consumers. A decline in personal consumption, writes the New York Times, “would be the first since 1991, and it would almost certainly push the entire economy into a recession in the middle of an election year.”

This recalls Bush’s advice after 9-11, when he assumed the mantle of the nation’s personal financial planner. He told everyone to go out and spend money so the economy could avoid recession. Even then, there was confusion about whether he was right or wrong. Some sensible voices pointed out that economic expansion is based not on spending but on capital expansion rooted in savings. That is to say, the only path to future prosperity is delaying current consumption in favor of future investment.

One only needs to think of the household budget here to see the point. If you are planning for the future for your family, what is the wisest course? Does one go into debt as much as possible, buy the largest house and the biggest car, throw lavish parties, hand out all existing liquid funds to friends and strangers? Based on the view that consumption is the way to avoid economic problems, this would indeed be the right course.

But this also defies everything we know about family finance. The path to a secure prosperity is delaying consumption. One should spend as little as possible and save as much as possible for the future, and let that money be used in the service of investments that yield a solid rate of return. Those who have chosen a different path now see the folly: they are being burned in the soft housing market, for example.

The lesson is also true for the nation at large, because the logic doesn’t magically change when moving from the family budget to the national stage. Just because something involves “macroeconomics” doesn’t mean that we should throw out all good sense. But that is precisely what people have done with regard to the economy, since J.M. Keynes somehow convinced the world that up is down and left is right.

In a recession or a crisis, the right approach for individuals is to save. So too for the national economy. A looming recession will prompt a pullback in consumer spending as a rational response to the perception of economic troubles. This action does not cause the economy to fall into recession any more than more spending can save it from recession. The downturn is a fact that cannot be avoided. We don’t blame umbrellas for floods, and, in the same way, we shouldn’t blame tightfisted consumers for recessions.

There is no question that this is what is happening. American Express reports that the rate of spending by its cardholders fell 4% in December. Surveys of consumer satisfaction with the economy report a 15-year low. Retailers report that December was a “bloodbath” (NYT’s words) for them, with sales growing at the slowest rate in seven years. Market watchers are mostly concerned that high-income buyers are bailing out.

Again, it is critical to keep cause and effect in mind. The pullback on spending is not going to cause a recession. If we think about the long term, this is not a dangerous trend but a hopeful one. The more people pull back and save, the more the foundation is laid for a recovery after the current correction takes its course.

To see that requires that we take a long view. Government, however, seems constitutionally incapable of seeing the long term, much less doing the right thing to prepare for it. Making matters worse, this is that dreaded event called an election year. Prettying things up to make the economy palatable to voters is priority number one.

What does this mean? More monetary expansion. More government spending. We can fully expect that the Bush administration could resort to its old program of sending checks out to every American family with the proviso that the money has to be spent, not saved.

No doubt that many people would be thrilled by this. But look beneath the surface. Government has no money to spend on anything that it doesn’t extract from the pockets of you and me and the whole American public. This is easy enough to see concerning taxes. It is not so easy to see when the government runs up debt that is guaranteed by the printing presses.

The monetary issue can be understood by analogy to orange juice. The more water you add, the less substance it has. If you keep adding, eventually you come to the point when you can no longer tell that it was ever orange. This is the same with money. If you print enough – literally or electronically through the credit markets – it will continue to lose value. If money grew on trees, it would be about as valuable as autumn leaves.

So long as we have a central bank, government will be tempted to take the easy path of easy money. There do not need to be any secret phone calls from the White House to the Fed. The culture of policymaking itself is capable of broadcasting the right signals to all important players.

In any case, it is a myth that the Fed makes policy independent of political pressure. It is subject to the screams and hollers for looser credit in the same way that bureaucracies are responsive to demands for more regulation. It is what it is most suited to do in any case.

Yes, government can increase consumption, but by doing so it does nothing to care for the long term. The long-term health of a nation is not different from that of a household budget. Tough times require cutbacks and a beefing up of savings.

So let’s not demonize the consuming public for doing what it should be doing. It’s a good rule of thumb that when the government tells you to spend money, close your wallet.
Politicians War and Greed
but people is waking up………